Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT)

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist

What is allergen-specific immunotherapy?

The practice of administering to allergic patients gradually increasing doses of an allergen to achieve and maintain hyposensitization toward the allergen. CPT Code 95165 is from the Medicare physician fee schedule for allergy immunotherapy.

Benefits of immunotherapy

- Effective for venom anaphylaxis, allergic rhinconjunctivitis and asthma cause by
inhalant allergen
- Provides long-term benefits - there was still a significant clinical benefit six years
after discontinuation of grass pollen immunotherapy in childhood (Allergy 2002 57:4 306).
- Modifies the natural course of the disease (allergic rhinitis)
- Prevents new sensitizations
- Reduces progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma in children with allergic rhinitis, if started early

Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy


Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy (click to enlarge the image).

Cellular mechanisms

- Expands allergen-specific Th1 immunity
- suppresses Th2 response
- Induces regulatory T cells (Tregs) - Tr1 produce IL-10 and Th3 produce TGF-β
- Increases mRNA for Th1 cytokines (IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-12)
- Reduces mRNA for Th2 cytokines (IL-4)

Successful immunotherapy is often associated with a shift from TH2 to TH1 CD4+ lymphocyte immune response to allergen.

Humoral mechanisms

- Reduction in allergen-specific IgE
- Increase in allergen specific IgG antibodies lead to neutralization of allergen, blockage of IgE-facilitated allergen presentation to T cells, and blockage of IgE-dependent activation of mast cells and basophils

However, increases in allergen-specific IgG blocking antibody titer are not predictive of the duration and degree of efficacy of immunotherapy.

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT)

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was first introduced by Leonard Noon in 1911. There is a small but real risk of IgE-mediated reactions, including anaphylaxis and death. Systemic reactions occur in 0.05-0.6% of doses administered.

Terms

Other terms that have been used for allergen immunotherapy are hyposensitization, allergen-specific desensitization, and the common terms allergy shots or injections.

Major allergen refers to any antigen that binds to human IgE sera in more than 50% of patients in a clinically sensitive group.

Vaccine, or allergen vaccine, is the recommended term for the therapeutic preparations used in allergen immunotherapy.

Extracts, or allergen extracts, are solutions of proteins and glycoproteins extracted from source materials such as pollen, mold cultures, and pelt.

Desensitization is a process by which effector cells are rendered less reactive or nonreactive to IgE-mediated immune responses by the rapid administration of incremental doses of an allergenic substance.

Rush immunotherapy: incremental doses of allergen are administered at intervals varying between 15 to 30 minutes and 24 hours, until the optimal effective dose is achieved.

Modified rush immunotherapy: subcutaneous allergen injections are administered at 24-hour intervals.

Cluster immunotherapy is the administration of two or more injections per visit to achieve a maintenance dose. It is a type of rush immunotherapy characterized by the giving of several allergen injections in a single day of treatment.

There are Different Build-Up Regimens

1. Conventional / routine (once-twice/week)
2. Daily
3. Cluster (two or more injections per visit)
4. Rush / modified rush / Ultra-rush

Build Up Phase

Conventional SCIT involves receiving injections with increasing amounts of the allergen. Injections ranges from 1 to 3 times a week.The duration of generally ranges from 3 to 6 months at a frequency of 2 times and 1 time per week, respectively.

Cluster immunotherapy is an accelerated build-up schedule that entails administering several injections at increasing doses (generally 2-3 per visit) sequentially in a single day of treatment on nonconsecutive days. The maintenance dose is generally achieved within 4 to 8 weeks.

Rush immunotherapy is an accelerated immunotherapy build-up schedule that entails administering incremental doses of allergen at intervals varying between 15 and 60 minutes over 1 to 3 days until the target therapeutic dose is achieved.

Cluster SCIT

SCIT 1 or 2 times per week with a schedule that contains fewer total injections than are used with conventional immunotherapy.

2 or more injections are given per visit on nonconsecutive days. The injections are typically given at 30-minute intervals. The patient can reach a maintenance dose in 4 weeks.

The cluster schedule is associated with the same or a slightly increased frequency of systemic reactions compared with immunotherapy administered with more conventional schedules.

The occurrence of both local and systemic reactions to cluster immunotherapy can be reduced with administration of an antihistamine 2 hours before dosing.

Rush SCIT

The most accelerated schedule that has been described for inhalant allergens involves
administering 7 injections over the course of 4 hours.

Ultra-rush immunotherapy schedules have been described for stinging insect hypersensitivity to achieve a maintenance dose in as little as 3.5 to 4 hours.

Maintenance Phase for all forms of SCIT (conventional, cluster and rush)

The maintenance phase begins when the effective therapeutic dose is reached. Once the maintenance dose is reached, the intervals between the allergy injections are increased.

The dose generally is the same with each injection, although modifications can be made based on several variables (ie, new vials or a persistent large local reaction causing discomfort).

The intervals between maintenance immunotherapy injections generally ranges from 4 to 8 weeks for venom and every 2 to 4 weeks for inhalant allergens but can be advanced as tolerated if clinical efficacy is maintained.

Definitions for Maintenance Phase SCIT

- Maintenance concentrate - preparation that contains individual or mixtures of manufacturer’s allergen extracts intended for allergen immunotherapy treatment. A maintenance concentrate can be composed of a concentrated dose of a single allergen or a combination of concentrated allergens to prepare an individual patient’s customized allergen immunotherapy extract mixture.

- Maintenance dose (effective therapeutic dose) - the dose that provides therapeutic efficacy without significant adverse local or systemic reactions. The effective therapeutic dose may not be the initially calculated projected effective dose.

- Maintenance goal (projected effective dose) - the allergen dose projected to provide therapeutic efficacy. The maintenance goal is based on published studies, but a projected effective dose has not been established for allergens. Not all patients will tolerate the projected effective dose, and some patients experience therapeutic efficacy at lower doses.

The average duration of immunotherapy is 3-5 years.

Evidence for Efficacy for SCIT (in declining order of efficacy)

- Grass pollens
- Ragweed pollen
- Birch pollen
- Mountain cedar pollen
- Parietaria species pollen
- Cat and dog dander
- Dust mites

Effective Doses of Extracts

Ragweed
4-24 mcg Amb a 1

D. pt
3.25-12 mcg Der p 1

D far
10 mcg Der f 1

Timothy
15-20 mcg Phl p 5

Cat
11-17 mcg Fel d 1

Dog
5 mcg Can f 1

Birch
3.28-12 mcg Bet v 1

Alternaria
1.6 mcg Alt a 1

Standardized extracts are preferred.

- BAU (Bioequivalent Allergy Unit) is based on ID(50) EAL method.

- AU (Allergy Units) was used before BAU and is based upon the major allergen content. Dust mites have AU=BAU.

- Major allergen: Amb a 1, (One FDA unit of Amb a 1 equals 1 mg of Amb a 1, and 350 units of Amb a 1/mL is equivalent to 100,000 BAU/mL). Can f 1 allergen now is also standardized.

Extract concentrations

- WT/Vol - If the extract is 1:10, use 1 ml, if the extract is 1:20, use 2 ml
- Each vial is usually 5 ml or 10 ml
- Dust mite – Use 1 ml of each type & 2ml (max) (5000 AU/ml). If dust mite concentration is 10,000 AU/ml, then use 0.5ml of each type.
- Cat - can use up to 3 ml - up to 30,000 U (10,000 U/ml)
- Bermuda - Use 0.4ml - 4000 U (10,000 U/ml)
- Northern Grasses - Use 0.4 ml - 40,000 U (100,000 U/ml)
- Ragweed - Use 0.5 or 0.6 ml (200 Ag EU/ml)

Venom extract dose

- Vespid venom 100 mcg/ml
- Mixed vespid venom 300 mcg/ml

Commercial honey bee venom vaccine is prepared from venom obtained by electrical stimulation. Commercial vespid venom protein vaccines are prepared by extraction of dissected venom sacs.

Starting Dose in Conventional SCIT

Common starting dilutions from the maintenance concentrate are 1:10,000 (vol/vol) or 1:1000
(vol/vol). Even more diluted concentrations frequently are used for patients who are highly
sensitive, as indicated by history or skin test reaction.

Conventional SCIT Build-up Phase

The frequency of allergen immunotherapy administration during the build-up phase is usually 1 to 2 injections per week.

With this schedule, a typical patient can expect to reach a maintenance dose in 4 to 6 months. The interval between injections is empiric but might be as short as 1 day without any increase in the occurrence of systemic reactions.

Example SCIT schedule:

Vial #4, 1:1000, Schedule A
0.05 ml
0.15 ml
0.25 ml
0.5 ml

Vial #3, 1:100, Schedule B
0.05 ml
0.1 ml
0.2 ml
0.3 ml
0.4 ml
0.5 ml

Vial #2, 1:10, Schedule C
0.05 ml
0.07 ml
0.1 ml
0.2 ml
0.3 ml
0.4 ml
0.5 ml

Vial #1, 1:1, Schedule D
0.05 ml
0.07 ml
0.1 ml
0.15 ml
0.2 ml
0.25 ml
0.3 ml
0.4 ml
0.5 ml

Alternative SCIT schedule

Vial #5, 1:10,000
0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5 ml

Vial #4, 1:1000
0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5 ml

Vial #3, 1:100
0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5 ml

Vial #2, 1:10
0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5 ml

Vial #1, 1:1
0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.35, 0.5 (this is maintenance dose)

Dosing adjustments in SCIT

Late or missed doses:
- 7 days or less - no change
- 8-13 days - repeat previous dose
- 14-21 days - decrease dose by 25%
- 21-28 days - decrease dose by 50%
- If the patient missed the injections for more than 6 weeks, go back to the previous vial

New vial - reduce dose by 50%. No need to reduce in venom SCIT.

Systemic reactions - decrease to the last tolerated dose or even lower.

Preservatives of extracts

The glycerinated allergen extract formulation is based on 50% glycerin.

Extracts prepared in saline or buffer solutions with less than 50% glycerin are referred to as aqueous.

Most standardized allergenic extracts are available only as glycerinated products. For most of the standardized products the expiration date is three years from the date of manufacture. The only standardized aqueous product, short ragweed extract, has an expiration dating of 12 months from the date of manufacture.

Non-standardized extracts

- w/v: the weight of allergen source material extracted with a given volume of fluid (weight by
volume)

– 1:100 indicates that 1 g of dry allergen was added to 100 ml of a buffer for extraction

- PNU: protein nitrogen unit, an estimate of the protein nitrogen content of an extract, where 0.01 g of protein nitrogen equals 1 PNU

Extracts with a particular wt/vol or PNU potency can have widely varying biologic activities.

Outdoor molds: Alternaria, Cladosporium, Drechslera (Helminthosporium).

Indoor molds: Penicillium and Aspergillus - they also have the highest extract protease concentration, in the 200s mcg range. Cockroach extract has a protease concentration of 168 mcg. Alternaria is 29 mcg and house dust mite is less than 5 mcg.

Indications for SCIT

- Allergic Rhinitis
- Allergic Asthma
- Venom Allergy

SCIT is Not Indicated

- Atopic Dermatitis
- Food Allergy

Relative Contraindications for SCIT

- Chronic Urticaria/ Angioedema
- Unstable Asthma
- Concurrent use of Beta-blockers (including topicals, e.g. eye drops) or ACE Inhibitors
- Severe Coronary Artery Disease
- Malignancy
- Unable to Communicate Clearly (children younger than 5 years old)
– Significant immunodeficiency
– Severe psychological disorders
– Poor compliance with medications
– Severe obstructive lung disease (limited reserve)
– Conditions that contraindicate epinephrine use

Venom Immunotherapy (VIT)

VIT with 300-mcg doses of mixed vespid venom provides 98% efficacy. Honeybee VIT is 75% to 85% effective.

VIT is generally not necessary in children 16 years of age and younger who have experienced cutaneous systemic reactions without other systemic manifestations.

Adults who have experienced only cutaneous manifestations to an insect sting are generally considered candidates for VIT, although the need for immunotherapy in this group of patients is controversial.

Because the natural history of fire ant hypersensitivity in children who have only cutaneous manifestations has not been well elucidated and there is increased risk of fire ant stings in children who live in areas where fire ants are prevalent, immunotherapy might be considered.

Pregnancy and SCIT

Allergen immunotherapy is usually not initiated during pregnancy because of risks associated with systemic reactions and their treatment (ie, spontaneous abortion, premature labor, or fetal hypoxia).

The initiation of immunotherapy might be considered during pregnancy for a high-risk medical condition, such as anaphylaxis caused by Hymenoptera hypersensitivity.

When a patient receiving immunotherapy reports that she is pregnant, the dose of immunotherapy is usually not increased, and the patient is maintained on the dose that she is receiving at that time.

Allergists should provide an EpiPen prescriptions to all patients on SCIT.

References


Related reading

Immunotherapy reduces asthma symptoms and use of asthma medication. Cochrane Review, 2010. http://bit.ly/bXXITA - http://bit.ly/bRNiXY - http://bit.ly/bED4BH
Allergen Immunotherapy: A History of the First 100 Years. Medscape, 2011.
Immunotherapy can provide lasting relief - AAAAI info sheet for patients (PDF).
Dose adjustments for patients late for allergen immunotherapy injections. AAAAI Ask The Expert, 2010. http://goo.gl/je9tE
Your allergy meds may be making you fat - Regular use of OTC antihistamines has been linked to weight gain. NBC, 2011.
SCIT ("allergy shots") is at least as potent as pharmacotherapy in controlling the symptoms of allergic rhintis as early as the first season of therapy. JACI, 2011.
100 years since Leonard Noon published historic paper on SCIT “PROPHYLACTIC INOCULATION AGAINST HAY FEVER” in the Lancet http://goo.gl/Zw3FG
Allergen immunotherapy practice in the United States: guidelines, measures, and outcomes (2011) http://goo.gl/xHYjG
Best Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma: SCIT or SLIT? SCIT is likely more effective, SLIT is safer. Medscape, 2011.

Published: 06/27/2010
Updated: 11/27/2011

Labels: , ,

New approaches to immunotherapy

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at LSU (Shreveport) Department of Allergy and Immunology


Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy (click to enlarge the image).

Novel approaches to immunotherapy

- Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)
- Peptide-based immunotherapy
- CpG-enhanced immunotherapy
- Anti-IgE and immunotherapy
- Recombinant allergen vaccines

SLIT

Interesting fact: The longest human tongue ever recorded was that of Stephen Taylor and measures 9.8 centimetres (3.86 in). The longest tongue for a female is that of Annika Irmler at 7 centimetres (2.76 in).

The World Health Organization concluded that SLIT was a viable alternative to SCIT in 1998.

Practical aspects of SLIT

- Self-administered by patients
- Soluble tablets or drops
- Sublingual-swallow: keep under the tongue for 1-2 min, then swallow. Contact time with the oral mucosa is critical to the effectiveness of SLIT - if the allergen is immediately swallowed, there are negligible clinical effects.
- Dose of allergen greater than for SCIT (3-300 times higher)
- Administration schedule and amount of allergen vary, depending on the manufacturer
- Amount of allergen given during a course of SLIT is higher than in SCIT: there is a bild-up phase (very rapid), followed by a maintenance phase

Efficacy of SLIT in allergic rhinitis

The magnitude of clinical efficacy ranged from 20-60% reduction of symptoms. House dust mite (HDM) SLIT was less effective, but results were comparable to SCIT. For HDM, duration of treatment seems to be crucial - treatments that lasted longer than 24 months had positive results.

Clinical safety of SCIT vs. SLIT

Safety of SCIT

Systemic reactions occur in 0.05-0.6% of doses administered. Rare fatalities have been reported.

Safety of SLIT

No life-threatening adverse events reported since 1986. Most common adverse effects include oral/sublingual itching, stomachache, and nausea. No increased risk in patients with oral allergy syndrome.

CpG-enhanced immunotherapy

Bacterial DNA contains unmethylated CpG di-nucleotides (CpG motifs) that act as a danger signal to the vertebrate immune system and trigger protective innate and acquired immune responses.

CpGs work through toll-like receptor 9 (TLR-9) to activate monocytes, dendritic cells, B cells, and NK cells. CPGs promote Th1 and inhibit Th2 response (similar to allergen-specific SCIT).

The immune stimulatory activity of bacterial DNA can be mimicked by synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides containing CpG motifs. They can be added to a vaccine or linked to an
antigen to greatly boost the immune response.

Anti-IgE (omalizumab (Xoliar) and immunotherapy

The combination anti-IgE and allergen immunotherapy might offer advantages that
neither method can provide separately. Anti-IgE administered during the induction phase
of immunotherapy might reduce the risk of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis.

References


Related reading

Immunotherapy in Asthma - 11-page Medscape review http://goo.gl/KUAcA
Sublingual immunotherapy is an extremely complex issue in the U.S. AAAAI http://goo.gl/wVOKr
Timothy grass allergy immunotherapy tablets safe and effective in American children with allergic rhinitis http://goo.gl/tsKL4
Efficacy and safety of timothy grass allergy immunotherapy tablet treatment in North American adults - it works. http://goo.gl/ePOFG

Published: 06/27/2010
Updated: 04/15/2011

Labels: , ,

Treatment of Pediatric Asthma

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at LSU (Shreveport) Department of Allergy and Immunology

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory disease, affecting up to 10% of adults and 30% of children (JACI, 2011).

Asthma pathogenesis

Dust mites play a major role in asthma pathogenesis.

Bronchial provocation with particles: dust mite fecal particles are 30 µm in diameter (same size as pollen grain). They do not stay airborne and do not cause allergic comjunctivitis. Pollen grains are airborne, have spicules and cause 90% of allergic conjunctivitis cases.

10% of inhaled pollen grains and mite fecal particles enter lungs. Dust mite fecal particles and pollen grains are 1000 times larger than penicillin spores. A single mite fecal particle will produce a small focus of inflammation in lung.

Not all wheezing is asthma

Wheezing occurrences in children:

- single episode in 30% to 50% of children before 5 yr of age
- 40% who wheeze before 3 yr of age continue at 6 yr (“persistent wheezers”)
- 50% of infants who wheeze once will wheeze again within several months


Wheezing in Children - Phenotypes (click to enlarge the image).

Childhood asthma phenotypes:

- transient early wheezers - wheeze sometime during first year of life; risk factors include prematurity, history of parental smoking during pregnancy, and passive exposure to tobacco smoke; such patients do not respond to inhaled bronchodilators or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS); wheezing tends to remit as child’s airway gets larger (between ages 2-3 yr)

- nonatopic wheezers - 0 to 6 yr of age; wheeze associated exclusively with viral infection; usually no eczema or family history; wheezing tends to remit by 6 yr of age

- atopic wheezers - past 5 yr of age, allergic - have positive blood and skin testing to inhalant allergens; tend to present within 2 to 3 yr of age, and continue to wheeze; wheezing not related to URTI


Childhood asthma phenotypes (click to enlarge the image).

Modified Asthma Predictive Index (API):

Children under the age of 3 with ALL of the following:

- 4 wheezing exacerbations in past year
- with one physician-confirmed episode
- plus one major criteria OR 2 minor criteria

Major criteria - 1 of the following:

- parental history (mother who had childhood asthma only, father with exercise-induced asthma)
- physician-diagnosed atopic eczema
-allergic sensitization to one aeroallergen.

Minor criteria - 2 of the following:

- allergic sensitization to milk, eggs, or peanuts (positive skin or blood test sufficient)
- wheezing unrelated to respiratory illness (ie, cold)
- blood eosinophilia 4% of total white blood cell (WBC) count

Positive API = 10 times more likely to have persistent asthma.


Modified Asthma Predictive Index (mAPI) (click to enlarge the image).

mAPI relies heavily on wheezing. However, asthma can occur in children without wheezing.

Cough-variant asthma

Chronic, persistent cough - without wheezing - may be the only manifestation of asthma. More than 60% bronchial obstruction is needed to produce wheezing - asthma can occur without wheezing - spirometry is required for diagnosis.

Cough-variant asthma presents as dry cough at night. It worsens with exercise (EIA) and nonspecific triggers (cold air).

Cough-variant asthma responds to asthma therapy with ICS.

Cough-variant asthma is diagnosed with pulmo­nary function testing (PFTs) with response to bronchodilator.

The most common cause of chronic cough in children is cough-variant asthma.

Guidelines

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines for diagnosis and management of asthma (2007) are only available online. Key concepts:

- severity dictates therapy
- distinction between intermittent and persistent asthma - "rule of 2s”
- 4 levels of asthma severity - intermittent; 3 sublevels of persistent
- inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) preferred for all levels of persistent asthma
- use of asthma action plans
- spirometry recommended

Rule of 2s - if symptoms are present for more than 2 days per week or for more than 2 nights per month, asthma categorized as persistent. Within this category, disease must be classified as mild, moderate, or severe. However, as severity of asthma not constant, must monitor patients for changes; as severity changes, therapy should change too.

The category of “mild intermittent” asthma was eliminated in the 2007 guidelines - now it is just called “intermittent” asthma.

The concepts of “impairment”, “risk”, and “control” were introduced in the 2007 guidelines:

- impairment - refers to symptoms
- risk - refers to likelihood that the patient will eventually have exacerbation of asthma and present to emergency department (ED) or hospital, or need course of oral corticosteroids
- control - refers to the level of patient’s asthma control

ICS therapy probably does not make difference in prevention of airway remodeling.

Classification of asthma severity:

- impairment domain - daytime and nighttime symptoms (rule of 2's), use of short-acting beta-agonist (SABA), interference with normal activities

- risk domain - number of exacerbations per year (if more than 2, daily controller medication is needed). Increased risk is conferred by parental history of asthma or history of eczema.

Childhood Asthma Control Test (ACT) is validated down to age 4 yr. Adult ACT questionnaire should be used for teenagers (cutoff age is 11 years).

Treatment steps:

- step 1 - SABA as needed
- step 2 - low-dose ICS monotherapy vs. leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA)
- step 3 - low-to-medium dose ICS plus long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)
- step 4 - high-dose ICS therapy plus LABA and (if needed) systemic corticosteroids. Omalizumab (Xolair; anti-IgE antibody) is prescribed before placing patient on daily oral corticosteroids.

“Rule of 2s” to determine level of control:

- daytime symptoms more than 2 days/wk
- rescue β2 -agonist use more than 2 times per week
- nighttime symptoms more than 2 nights/mo
- more than 2 rescue β2-agonist canisters/yr

When to step down therapy?

If patient is well-controlled for 3 mo, consider stepping down therapy.

When to step up therapy?

If the patient is not well-controlled, step up therapy and re-evaluate in 2 to 6 wk. If the patient is very poorly controlled, step up therapy 2 steps, consider short course of steroids, and reassess in 2 wk.

There was an increase in the use of preventive asthma medication from 18% in 1988–1994 to 35% in 2005–2008 among children with asthma (Pediatrics, 2012).

Which ICS to choose?

- delivery system best for patient’s developmental stage
- optimal lung deposition

Particle size may play a role in lung deposition of ICS - ciclesonide (Alvesco) has smaller particle size that results in good lung deposition.

When to consider long-term ICS treatment:

- positive API and more than 3 wheezing episodes in previous 12 mo lasting more than 1 day and affecting sleep

- consistent requirement for SABA treatment (more than 2 times/wk, on average, over 1-2 mo); 2 exacerbations in 6 mo requiring oral corticosteroids

As severity increases, increase ICS dose:

Children younger than 5

- budesonide inhalation suspension (Pulmicort Respules)
- fluticasone propionate (Flovent)
- mometasone tripattern inhaler (Asmanex Twisthaler)

Children 5 to 11 yr of age

- low-dose ICS (budesonide dry powder inhaler (DPI) or inhalation suspension (Pulmicort Respules)
- beclomethasone hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)
- add long-acting β agonist (LABA) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA)


ICS treatment options for pediatric asthma (click to enlarge the image).


Asthma Inhalers (click to enlarge the image).

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)

Relative binding affinity for glucocorticoid receptor (GR): mometasone > fluticasone > budesonide > triamcinolone.

Relative anti-inflammatory potency: mometasone = fluticasone > budesonide = beclomethasone > triamcinolone.



Severe asthma - differential diagnosis and management (click to enlarge the image).

References

New NHLBI guidelines for asthma: is anything really new? Michael J. Welch, MD. Audio-Digest Pediatrics, Volume 56, Issue 01, January 7, 2010.
Advances in pediatric asthma in 2010: Addressing the major issues. Szefler SJ. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):102-15.
Immunopathogenesis of Asthma in Childhood. Thomas A.E. Platts-Mills. Audio-Digest Pediatrics, Volume 55, Issue 02, January 21, 2009.
Asthma management update. Hary T. Katz, MD. Audio-Digest Pediatrics, Volume 55, Issue 02, January 21, 2009.
The Asthma Predictive Index: A very useful tool for predicting asthma in young children. Jose A. Castro-Rodriguez. JACI, 2010.
A clinical index to define risk of asthma in young children with recurrent wheezing. Castro-Rodriguez JA, Holberg CJ, Wright AL, Martinez FD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1403–1406.
Patterns of fetal and infant growth are related to atopy and wheezing disorders at age 3 years - Thorax http://goo.gl/UGB8a
Inhaled steroids can suppress growth of children who are 2 years of age weighing less than 15 kg (high dose per kg). AAAAI, 2011.
Asthma Predictive Index not better than simple prediction based only on preschool wheeze? (performance was low for both). JACI, 2011.
Achieving control of asthma in preschoolers. CMAJ, March 9, 2010; 182 (4).
House dust mite sensitization in toddlers predicts wheeze at age 12 years (JACI, 2011).

Published: 06/01/2010
Updated: 01/02/2012

Labels: ,

<body>