Mnemonics: B Lymphocytes

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at LSU (Shreveport) Department of Allergy and Immunology

Mnemonic for mature B cells - 3 types

M
Mature B cells
Main B cell type
Marginal zone B cells

I/1
B1 B cell
Innate
Intestine

Two
B2 B cell
Two
T cell dependent



B Cell Types (click to enlarge the image).

B cell inhibition

2 or II
CD22
Fc gamma RII
ITIM motifs (II)

Published: 10/26/2009
Updated: 08/26/2010

Labels: ,

Venom immunotherapy (VIT)

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at LSU (Shreveport) Department of Allergy and Immunology


Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy (click to enlarge the image).

Extracts

Allergen (venom) vaccine is the recommended term for the therapeutic agent used in allergen immunotherapy. "Vaccine" is used when the therapeutic use of the preparation is
clear. "Extract" is used when the non-therapeutic aspects of the allergen preparation are discussed.

Extracts of honeybee, yellow jacket, white-faced hornet, yellow hornet, and wasp venom are available for skin testing and VIT.

There is no venom extract for fire ant hypersensitivity but a whole-body extract is available.

Tests

Skin prick tests with a concentration in the range of 1.0 to 100 mcg/mL may be performed before intracutaneous (intradermal) tests but are not used by all allergists.

Intracutaneous tests start with a concentration in the range of 0.001 to 0.01 mcg/mL. If
intracutaneous test results at this concentration are negative, the concentration is increased by 10-fold increments until a positive skin test response occurs or a maximum concentration of 1.0 mcg/ mL is reached.

A positive intradermal skin test to insect venom at a concentration of 1.0
mcg/mL or lower is indicative of specific IgE antibodies.

Skin testing with fire ant whole-body extract is indicative of specific IgE antibodies if a positive response occurs at a concentration of 1:100 wt/vol or less by prick method, or 1:1000 wt/vol or less by intradermal method.

If the skin test is negative despite a convincing history of anaphylaxis after
an insect sting, in vitro testing for IgE antibodies or repeat skin testing is recommended.

Venon immunotherapy (VIT)

30-60% of patients with a history of anaphylaxis from an insect sting who have venom-specific IgE antibodies (skin or in vitro testing) will experience a systemic reaction when stung again.

VIT is not necessary in children 16 years of age and younger who have experienced isolated
cutaneous systemic reactions without other systemic manifestations. They only have a 10% chance of having a systemic reaction if stung again, and if one occurs, it is unlikely to be worse
than the initial isolated cutaneous reaction.

VIT in adults who have experienced only cutaneous systemic reaction is controversial but usually recommended.

VIT is extremely effective in reducing the risk of systemic reaction to less than 5%, and sting reactions that occur during VIT are usually milder.

VIT is generally not necessary for patients who have had only a large local reaction because the risk of a systemic reaction is low.

The vast majority of patients who have had a large local reaction do not need to be tested for specific IgE.

How do you define a large local reaction to insect sting?

- increase in size for 24 to 48 hours,
- swelling to more than 10 cm in diameter
- 5 to 10 days to resolve

Patients who have experienced large local reactions often have large local
reactions to subsequent stings, and up to 10% might eventually have a systemic reaction.

What is the difference between a large local reaction and a systemic cutaneous reaction?

Systemic reactions can include a spectrum of manifestations ranging from mild to life-threatening:

- cutaneous reactions (eg, urticaria and angioedema),
- bronchospasm
- large airway obstruction (tongue or throat swelling, laryngeal edema)
- hypotension and shock.

The key feature that distinguishes a systemic cutaneous reaction from a large local reaction is the involvement of parts of the body not contiguous with the site of the sting.

What is the dose of VIT?

VIT injections start weekly, beginning with doses no greater than 0.1 to 1.0 mcg, and increasing to a maintenance dose of 100 mcg of each venom (e.g., 1 mL of a vaccine containing 100 mcg/mL of venom).

The dosage schedule for fire ant immunotherapy is less well defined. A maintenance dose
is 0.5 mL of a 1:100 wt/vol concentration.

The interval between maintenance dose injections can be increased to 4-week intervals during the first year of VIT and to every 6 to 8 weeks during subsequent years.

How long to continue VIT?

VIT should be continued for at least 3 to 5 years. Despite the persistence of a positive skin test response, 80-90% of patients will not have a systemic reaction to an insect sting if VIT is stopped after 3 to 5 years.

Some patients with a history of severe anaphylaxis with shock or loss of consciousness still might be at continued risk for a systemic reaction if VIT is stopped, even after
5 years of immunotherapy.

Patients who have experienced a systemic reaction carry injectable epinephrine (eg, EpiPenTM or TwinJectTM devices) at all times.

Patients who take beta-blocker are at greater risk for anaphylaxis to VIT or a sting. Patients who have stinging insect hypersensitivity should not be prescribed beta-blockers unless absolutely necessary.

References

Stinging Insect Hypersensitivity: A Practice parameter Update. Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology.
Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy. Medscape review, 2011.
Stinging Insect Guidelines - 2001 Update by AAAAI and ACAAI. Medscape, 2011.

Published: 10/12/2009
Updated: 06/12/2011

Labels: , , ,

Diagnosis of Drug Allergy

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Assistant Professor, Allergist/Immunologist, University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist, Fort Lauderdale, FL

Acute drug allergy within 2 hours of a dose of a single drug is relatively easy to diagnose. Unfortunately, most clinical presentations of drug allergy are much more complex.

The average hospitalized patient receives more than 8 drugs simultaneously. Outpatient medical management of chronic conditions often requires polypharmacy.

History is of paramount importance.

Skin prick testing is only standardized for PCN. Only 10 to 20% of patients who report a penicillin allergy have a positive reaction on skin tests.

Patch test is used for contact dermatitis which is a type IV allergic reaction (T-cell mediated).

Serum tryptase is a market of mast cell degranulation and may be helpful in diagnosis of ADR due to allergy.

Step-by-step approach to evaluation of drug allergy when receiving multiple medications

1. History

Drug reaction history
Atopic history
List of concomitant medications, with starts, stops, and dose changes
Previous exposures to same or cross-reacting drugs

2. Narrow drug candidate list by focusing on:

- temporal association between drug starts and stops and onset
- intensification and waning

3. Rank drug candidates by allergenic potential

4. Stop all drug candidates with good temporal relationship and known allergic potential. Observe consequences.

5. Consider skin testing if suspected drug is clinically imperative, to assess IgE response. Disregard negative results within 14 days of anaphylaxis (false negative), and for all haptenic drugs without validated negative predictive value.

6. Re-administer incriminated drugs as clinically indicated. Use gradual dose escalation (if skin test negative) or desensitization protocol (if reaction IgE dependent or skin test positive).

Mnemonic

HASTA la vista (Spanish, "See you later")

History
Assemble a list of drugs and rank them
Stop all drug candidates
Test
Administer - dose escalation or desensitization

Drug skin testing with invalidated reagents is not helpful if negative.

Reintroduction of a drug by serial dose escalations may be useful in idiosyncratic drug reactions of limited severity.

Re-challenge is strongly contraindicated in severe exfoliative dermatitis syndromes, and even with milder dermatoses that include mucosal membrane lesions.

History

History alone is often not sufficient for establishing drug sensitivity.

Fewer than 20% of patients with a history of drug allergy are really allergic to the offending drug. Diagnosis of sensitivity based on history alone is not sufficient.

Drug provocation tests are the gold standard for diagnosis of drug allergy.

Skin testing

Testing for drug-specific antibodies or lymphocytes is informative in theory, but no so much in practice.

Prick and intradermal skin testing for drug-specific IgE antibody have been usefully applied to β-lactam antibiotics and other drugs. Rate of false-negative tests is only well established for penicillins.

Penicillin minor determinants remain an ‘orphan drug’ in the USA and currently are accessible only under investigational protocols.

Allergic reactions observed in retreatment of history-positive, skin-test-negative patients have all been mild and self-limited; no life-threatening false-negative reactions have been reported.

More than 80% of history-positive patients will have negative penicillin skin tests.

Concentrations of 2–3 mg/mL of a cephalosporin are usually non-irritating, but each cephalosporin requires concurrent evaluation for its irritation potential in non-allergic subjects.

A positive cephalosporin skin test implies drug-specific IgE antibodies but a negative test does not exclude immediate hypersensitivity. Commercial cephalosporin skin test reagents are not available in the USA.

Specific IgE

In vitro test results have been compared with skin tests only in penicillin allergy.

Diagnostic sensitivity for penicilloyl-IgE is 65–85% compared with penicilloyl-polylysine skin tests and 32–50% compared with a combination of skin testing and provocational challenge.

Minor determinant penicillin IgE antibodies are not reliably detected by RAST.

Intradermal skin testing remains the diagnostic procedure of choice for IgE-dependent penicillin allergy.

RAST of IgE antibodies to quinolone antibiotics and other drugs have been reported but their validity is still not known.

Flow cytometry

Assessment of drug-induced basophil activation by surface markers (CD63).

Basophil activation test can be useful for in vitro diagnosis of NSAIDs hypersensitivity: specificity is 100%, sensitivity is 42.85%.

Similar to unvalidated skin tests, a clearly positive result is of greater clinical value than a negative result.

Detectable serum mast cell β tryptase (greather than 1 ng/mL) or plasma histamine (greater than 10 nmol/L) taken within 4 hours of a suspected allergic reaction suggest mast cell and basophil activation.

Immunoassays for IgG, IgM, or IgA responses to drug allergens have not been useful.

IgG to the penicilloyl determinant occur in 50% of patients receiving PCN but this is not associated with drug allergy.

Lymphocyte proliferation

Lymphocyte activation tests using drugs as stimulants are often positive in drug-allergic subjects, but this indistinguishable from nonallergic patients.

Lymphocyte transformation test was positive in 78% of patients classified as highly likely to be drug allergic. Specificity was 85%; however, false-positive results were observed, especially with NSAIDs.

References

Drug Allergy. Middleton's Allergy: Principles and Practice, Mosby; 7 edition (November 19, 2008).
Clinical review: ABC of allergies. Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ 1998;316:1511-1514.
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Faith L. Chia; Khai Pang Leong. Published on Medscape, 08/2007.
Basophil activation test for evaluation of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones http://goo.gl/LFEf

Multiple choice questions

Chapter 57: Drug Allergy. Allergy and Immunology Review Corner: Chapter 57 of Pediatric Allergy: Principles & Practices, edited by Donald Y.M. Leung, et al.

Published: 07/11/2007
Updated: 04/01/2011

Labels:

Adverse Drug Reactions: Types and Risk Factors

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Fellow, Creighton University Division of Allergy & Immunology
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Fellow, LSU (Shreveport) Department of Allergy & Immunology
Faculty Adviser: A. Bewtra, M.B.B.S., Professor, Creighton University Division of Allergy & Immunology

Risk factors for drug allergy

Positive penicillin skin tests do not occur more frequently in atopic individuals, but an atopic background is a risk factor for penicillin anaphylaxis.

Penicilloyl IgE immune responses progressively decline in most individuals, Over 3–8 years, more than 75% of prior penicillin reactors become skin test negative.

Having an antibiotic-sensitive parent carries a 15-fold increased risk of drug sensitivity.

There is a 10-fold increased risk for allergic reactions to unrelated antibiotics in patients with antibiotic sensitivity.

Strong associations of HLA-B 5701 with a hypersensitivity to the reverse-transcriptase inhibitor abacavir.

Non-allergic hypersensitivity reactions are also called ‘pseudoallergic drug reactions’

A subset of idiosyncratic reactions and must be distinguished from immunologic (allergic) reactions. They are often referred to as ‘anaphylactoid,’ a much-abused term.

Pseudoallergic/anaphylactoid reactions involve the same final common pathway as type I reactions. Basophils and mast cells are activated and vasoactive mediators are released by non-immune mechanisms.

Local anesthetics

Local anesthetic agents are good sensitizers when applied topically, but antibody-mediated allergic reactions are rare.

Pseudoallergic responses to local anesthetics (e.g. in dentistry) often lead to allergy consultations. Vasovagal syncope can mimic anaphylaxis. A clinical clue is bradycardia as opposed to the usual tachycardia that would accompany anaphylaxis)

Intradermal skin testing followed by a series of provocation dose challenges is the recommended diagnostic approach.

Nondrug-related reactions

- Vasovagal syncope after IV administration of an antibiotic
- Co-incidental symptoms, for example, viral exanthema in child who takes an antibiotic

Classification of adverse reactions to drugs: SOAP III


Figure 2. Classification of adverse reactions to drugs (click to enlarge the image).

In anyone

Overdose
Due to excess dose or impaired excretion, for example, liver failure due to acetaminophen overdose.

Side effect
Undesirable effect at recommended doses, for example, nausea with methylxanthines.

Interaction
One drug affects the effectiveness or toxicity of another drug, for example, erythromycin increases theophylline and digoxin blood levels.

Only in susceptible individuals

Intolerance
A low threshold to the normal action of a drug

Idiosyncrasy, from Greek, "a peculiar temperament"
A genetically determined abnormal reaction to a drug due to enzyme deficiency, for example, G6PD deficiency (hemolytic anemia after antioxidant drugs). You can always predict an idiosyncratic reaction in a patient with G6PD deficiency but the reaction cannot be predicted at a population level. Other examples of idiosyncrasy include quinidine-induced tinnitus, warfarin-induced skin necrosis and ACEi-related cough and angioedema.

Allergy
An immunologically mediated reaction, which is specific and re-occurs on re-exposure. IgE-mediated reactions constitute 10% of ADR.

Pseudoallergy or Anaphylactoid Reaction
Same clinical picture as an allergic reaction (result of histamine release) but lacking immunological specificity, for example, a reaction to IV contrast. Anaphylactoid reaction is a better term than "pseudoallergy."

"Codeine allergy" is a common misnomer. There is no skin test for "codeine allergy" because codeine causes mast cell degranulatio through a non-IgE mediated mechanism. Taxol used for chemotherapy of breast cancer is another common cause of "pseudoallergy" and most oncologist pre-medicate their patients to prevent an ADR.

SOAP III:

Side effect
Overdose
Allergy
Pseudoallergy

Interaction
Intolerance
Idiosyncrasy


Figure 3. SOAP III mnemonic for classification of adverse reactions to drugs (click to enlarge the image).

Clinical manifestations of drug reactions


Figure 4. Clinical manifestations of drug reactions (click to enlarge the image).

Anaphylaxis
PCN, neuromuscular blockers

Interstitial pneumonitis
Amiodarone, nitrofurantoin, chemoTx

Asthma
ASA, NSAIDs, beta-blockers

Hepatitis
Halothane, chlorpromazine, CBZ

Hemolytic anaemia
PCN, methyldopa

Thrombocytopenia
Furosemide, HCTZ, gold

Neutropenia
PCN

Agranulocytosis
Phenylbutazone, chloramphenicol

Aplastic anaemia
NSAIDs, sulphonamides

Interstitial nephritis, nephrotic syndrome
Cimetidine

Eosinophilic myocarditis
Methyldopa

Serum sickness, drug fever, vasculitis
Anticonvulsants, diuretics, antibiotics, hydralazine, procainamide, penicillamine

Skin reactions to drugs


Figure 5. Skin reactions to drugs (click to enlarge the image).

Pruritis, urticaria, angioedema, maculopapular rash
Most drugs

Contact dermatitis
Antibiotics

Photodermatitis
Griseofulvin, sulphonamides

Fixed drug eruption (lesion recurs at the same site after each administration)
MDZ, PCN

Toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN)
Sulphonamides, phenytoin, CBZ, barbiturates, allopurinol

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) affects less than 10% of the skin and there is no peripheral eosinophilia.

Toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN) affects 30% of the skin and patients often need to be treated in burn units due to complications such as contractures.

Manifestations of beta-lactams hypersensitivity: MAUS


Figure 6. Manifestations of beta-lactams hypersensitivity: MAUS (click to enlarge the image).

Maculopapular exanthema, 19%
Anaphylaxis without shock, 19%
Urticaria, 36%
Shock, anaphylactic shock, 17%

Penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems share a bicyclic nucleus (beta-lactam) which conveys a cross-reactivity in immune responses to these drugs. Cross-reactivity among penicillins is virtually complete.

Patients who react to PCN have a 10-20% risk of reactions to cephalosporins as well (15% on average). Newer studies suggest that cephalosporins without a beta-lactam side chain may be used relatively safely in patients who are allergic to PCN. First, it is important to collect a good history and establish that a true allergic reaction to PCN took place. Many patients say they are allergic when in reality they are not.

Not every apparent reaction is allergic, for example, amoxicillin may cause a rash which is not immune-mediated and does not preclude future use of the drug.

Drug allergy is a variable state and in the case of penicillin allergy, 85% of patients who give a history of a previous reaction to penicillin will tolerate a course of penicillin at a later stage. If more than 2 years have elapsed since a previous reaction, RAST or skin testing may be performed to confirm ongoing sensitivity.

Certain cephalosporins lack a beta-lactam side chain and can be used cautiously in PCN-allergic patients: Cefazolin, Cefuroxime, Cefdinir, Cefixime, Ceftibuten.

Which antibiotic has a lower risk of cross-reactivity in a patient with PCN allergy - aztreonam or imipenem?

Aztreonam.

Radiocontrast media

Adverse reactions to radiocontrast media occur in 4-8% of procedures. Anaphylaxis occurs in 1% and death in 0.001-0.009% of patients who receive radiocontrast media.

Mechanism may be related to complement activation, therefore an allergic reaction to IV contrast is usually anaphylactoid rather than anaphylactic reaction.

Anaphylactic reaction refers to a type I hypersensitivity reaction with mast cell/basophil degranulation mediated by antigen binding of specific IgE. Anaphylactoid reaction refers to a non–IgE-mediated mechanism of mast cell/basophil activation. Anaphylaxis refers to the physiologic events due to either mechanism.

Anaphylactoid reactions have the same final common pathway as type I reactions (anaphylactic). For example, in radiocontrast media reactions, opiate-induced urticaria, aspirin-induced asthma, basophils and mast cells are activated and vasoactive mediators are released by nonimmune mechanisms.

There are no diagnostic tests for radiocontrast media reactions. Patients with a previous reaction have a 17-35% chance of recurrence on re-exposure.

Prevention of reactions:
- newer low osmolarity radiocontrast media
- premedication with oral corticosteroids and antihistamines

Pretreatment protocols do not work for IgE-mediated anaphylaxis.

References

Drug Allergy. Middleton's Allergy: Principles and Practice, Mosby; 7 edition (November 19, 2008).
Clinical review: ABC of allergies. Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ 1998;316:1511-1514.
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Faith L. Chia; Khai Pang Leong. Published on Medscape, 08/2007.

Multiple choice questions

Chapter 57: Drug Allergy. Allergy and Immunology Review Corner: Chapter 57 of Pediatric Allergy: Principles & Practices, edited by Donald Y.M. Leung, et al.

Published: 07/11/2007
Updated: 09/01/2010

Labels:

Mnemonics: Drug Allergy

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at LSU (Shreveport) Department of Allergy and Immunology

T cell-meditated drug hypersensitivity subclassified as types IVabcd

IVa - 1 = Th1
IVb - 2 = Th2
IVc = cytotoxic CD8 T cells
IVd

Diagnosis of drug allergy

HASTA la vista (Spanish, See you later)

History
Assemble a list of drugs and rank them
Stop all drug candidates
Test
Administer - dose escalation or desensitization

Classification of adverse reactions to drugs: SOAP III

Side effect
Overdose
Allergy
Pseudoallergy

Interaction
Intolerance
Idiosyncrasy

Rule of 10s in ADR

10% of patients develop ADR
10% are due to allergy
10% lead to anaphylaxis
10 % lead to death

Mnemonics for penicillin allergy skin testing

Major penicillin determinant test detects
Majority of patients with penicillin allergy

Minor determinant test
Minorizes the risk

Manifestations of beta-lactams hypersensitivity: MAUS

Maculopapular exanthema, 19%
Anaphylaxis without shock, 19%
Urticaria, 36%
Shock, anaphylactic shock, 17%

References: Clinical presentation and time course in hypersensitivity reactions to β-lactams. Allergy, 2007.

Samter's triad include asthma, aspirin sensitivity, and nasal/ethmoidal polyposis:

ASPirin
Asthma
Sensitivity to aspirin
Polyps

T
Toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN)
Thirty percent of the skin (SJS less than 10%)
"Terrible" prognosis

Management of adverse drug reactions: PAD

Premedication with antihistamines and steroids
Avoidance
Desensitization

Published: 10/01/2009
Updated: 08/01/2011

Labels: ,

Drug Allergy: Pathophysiology

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist, Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D.; A. Bewtra, M.B.B.S., Professor, Creighton University Division of Allergy & Immunology

Recognition of drugs by the immune system

Karl Landsteiner first proposed that multivalency is essential for immune responses to foreign substances.

Drug macromolecules are large with multiple repeating epitopes.

A small molecule can have multiple recurrences of a single epitope that act as ‘complete’ allergens.

Quaternary ammonium epitopes render drugs such as succinylcholine bivalent and related neuromuscular blockers, as multivalent.

Most drugs are simple in structure have a small molecular weight - most do not qualify as drug allergens.

There are 2 ways in which small chemicals (weight lower than 1kDa) can fulfill the requirement for multivalency:

- direct binding with macromolecules to form multivalent hapten-carrier complexes
- reactive intermediates during drug metabolism

Haptenation

What is hapten?

Hapten is a small molecule which can elicit an immune response only when attached to a large carrier such as a protein. The carrier does not elicit an immune response on its own.

Haptenation is neither complete nor irreversible. For penicillins, less than 0.01% of drug is covalently protein-bound in plasma.

Penicillin binds with macromolecules to form multivalent hapten-carrier complexes. Haptenation results in a sufficient density of drug epitopes and a drug-specific immune response ensues.

The β-lactam ring is unstable and acylates lysine residues in proteins. This results in penicilloyl epitope which is immunodominant in penicillin allergy (major determinant).

Other molecular rearrangements allow β-lactams to haptenate through carboxyl and thiol groups, resulting in less dominant or ‘minor’ determinants.

Minor determinant IgE responses are of major clinical importance because of their association with anaphylaxis, whereas penicilloyl IgE responses are associated with urticaria.

Penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems share a bicyclic nucleus, which conveys variable cross-reactivity.

Cross-reactivity among penicillins is virtually complete.

Cephalosporins are similar to penicillins chemically but individual immune responses are variable. Third-generation cephalosporins (e.g., ceftazidime) are less likely to elicit cross-allergic responses than first-generation cephalosporins.

Carbapenems had a similar degree of cross-reactivity to first-generation cephalosporins in some studies.

Monobactams (prototype: aztreonam) are poorly immunogenic and very weakly cross-reactive with other β-lactams, likely due to the absence of a second nuclear ring structure.

Reactive intermediates during drug metabolism

Simple drugs can be converted into reactive intermediates during drug metabolism. Metabolism occurs in the liver by cytochrome P450-associated enzymes, which can produce protein-reactive intermediates.

Intracellular proteins can be haptenated, resulting in multivalent complex secreted from the cells and processed for both T and B lymphocyte activation.

For example, the acetylation and oxidation metabolism of sulfonamides leads to N4-sulfonamidoyl hapten.

Sulfonamide antimicrobials (sulfamethoxazole (SMX), sulfadiazine, sulfacetamide) differ from other sulfonamide-containing medications by having an aromatic amine at the N4 position and a substituted ring at the N1 position - not found in thiazide diuretics and sulfonylureas. Cross-reactivity between these groups of sulfonamides is very rare.

‘p–i concept’ - ‘pharmacological interaction of drugs with immune receptors’

A chemically inert drug, unable to covalently bind to proteins, can activate the immune system by binding to T cell receptors (TCR).

If the drug fits with into some of the more than 10 x 12 different T cell receptors, a stimulation of T cells may follow.

An MHC-augmented interaction with TCR may enhance the signal.

This monovalent drug-TCR interaction is similar to the interaction of drugs with pharmacological receptors. This is different from recognition of hapten-carrier complexes by TCR.

Direct drug binding to TCR can result in:

- tolerance from inhibitory signals
- partial or full activation

Activation may result in a clinical picture indistinguishable from the multivalent pathway.

Clinical manifestations of the p–i mechanism is a T cell orchestrated inflammation and causes drug exanthems (rashes) and drug-induced hepatitis.

Threshold of T cell activation is lowered by generalized immune stimulation of T cells by:

- systemic viral infection (e.g., EBV, CMV, HHV6)
- human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- autoimmune diseases

These diseases involve broad stimulation of T cells, high cytokine levels and expression of MHC- and co-stimulatory molecules.

The p–i mechanism does not require biotransformation of an inert drug to a chemically reactive compound. It is independent of the generation of hapten-specific antibody response.

The p–i concept can explain some of the ‘bizarre’ features of drug hypersensitivity:

- Rapid symptoms at the first encounter with the drug, without a sensitization phase. If T cells with many TCR respond to the drug, the reaction may appear rapidly.

- Higher risk of drug hypersensitivity in generalized viral infections, which lower the threshold for T cell reactivity.

- Superantigen-like stimulation, leading to a massive overstimulation

- Preferential involvement of the skin in drug allergy. The skin is a repository for an enormous number of T cells, many of which are considered to be primed memory-effector cells which perform sentinel functions and react rapidly. This explains the diffuse involvement of skin in many drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Factors affecting drug immunogenicity

Even with recurrent high-dose exposures, highly immunogenic drugs do not induce immune response in a majority of patients.

For penicillins, the IgG response rate for the major penicilloyl determinant is only 50% among hospitalized patients.

Immunology Classification

Allergenic drugs can induce the entire spectrum of immunopathologic reactions.

Gell and Goombs classification of hypersensitivity reactions: ACID

Anaphylaxis, angioedema, asthma, type I
Cytotoxic, antibody-mediated, type II, e.g AIHA, ITP, Graves'
Immune complex disease (CIC), type III, e.g. GN, serum sickness, drug fever
Delayed, cell-mediated, type IV, e.g. contact dermatitis

Type I, IgE-mediated drug reactions may involve anaphylaxis or urticaria. Type I reactions occur early or late in a course of therapy and can persist for weeks or months after drug withdrawal.

Type II cytolytic reactions are to rapidly haptenating drugs such as penicillin.

Type III, drug-specific immune complexes result from high-dose, prolonged therapy. They produce drug fever, serum sickness, and cutaneous vasculitis.

Type IV, contact dermatitis occurs with topically applied drugs. Highly sensitizing drugs such as penicillins are no longer provided in a topical form.

What is serum sickness?

From a historical perspective, the term serum sickness means a self-limited immune complex disease caused by exposure to foreign animal proteins or haptens.

Some proteins and large polypeptide drugs (e.g. insulin) can directly stimulate antibody production. However, most drugs act as haptens, binding to proteins, and then stimulating an allergic reaction.

Gell and Coombs classification of drug hypersensitivity was established before T cell subsets were known.

3 antibody-dependent types of reactions require an involvement of helper T cells.

T cell-meditated immunopathology has been subclassified as types IVa-IVd reactions

This subclassification considers the cytokine production and type of cells:

- monocytes (type IVa)
- eosinophils (type IVb)
- cytotoxic activity of both CD4 and CD8 T cells (type IVc)
- neutrophils (type IVd)

Type IVa (Th1)

Th1 cells activate macrophages by secreting large amounts of interferon-gamma.

Th1 cells drive the production of complement-fixing antibodies involved in type II and III reactions (IgG1, IgG3).

TH1 are co-stimulatory for TNF, IL-12 and CD8 T cell responses.

In vivo correlate is monocyte activation - in PPD or granuloma formation in sarcoidosis.

Th1 cells activate CD8 cells, which might explain the common combination of IVa and IVc reactions (e.g., in contact dermatitis).

Type IVb (Th2)

Th2 cells secrete IL-4, IL13, and IL-5, which promote B cell production of IgE and IgG4, mast cells and eosinophils.

There is a link to type I reactions, as Th2 cells boost IgE production by IL-4/IL-13 secretion.

Type IVc

T cells can act as cytotoxic cells. They emigrate to the tissue and kill tissue cells like hepatocytes or keratinocytes in a perforin/granzyme B and Fas ligand dependent manner.

Cytotoxic T cells play an important role in:

- maculopapular and bullous skin diseases
- neutrophilic inflammations (acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, AGEP)
- contact dermatitis

Type IVc reactions are important in bullous skin reactions like Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), where activated CD8 T cells kill keratinocytes.

Serum granulysin (level greater than 10 ng/mL) predicts Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis and the test takes just 5 minutes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:65-68.

Type IVd

T cells coordinate sterile neutrophilic inflammation of the skin, in particular AGEP. In this drug-induced disease, T cells recruit neutrophils via CXCL8 release and prevent their apoptosis via GM-CSF.

Such T cell reactions are also found in Behçet disease and pustular psoriasis.

Mnemonic

T cell-meditated drug hypersensitivity subclassified as types IVa-IVd:

IVa - 1 = Th1
IVb - 2 = Th2
IVc = cytotoxic CD8 T cells
IVd

References

Drug Allergy. Middleton's Allergy: Principles and Practice, Mosby; 7 edition (November 19, 2008).
Clinical review: ABC of allergies. Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ 1998;316:1511-1514.
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Faith L. Chia; Khai Pang Leong. Published on Medscape, 08/2007.

Multiple choice questions

Chapter 57: Drug Allergy. Allergy and Immunology Review Corner: Chapter 57 of Pediatric Allergy: Principles & Practices, edited by Donald Y.M. Leung, et al.

Published: 07/11/2007
Updated: 09/01/2011

Labels:

Drug Allergy: Introduction and Epidemiology

Author: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist, Assistant Professor at University of Chicago
Reviewer: S. Randhawa, M.D.; Faculty Adviser: A. Bewtra, M.B.B.S., Professor, Creighton University Division of Allergy & Immunology

Introduction

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are organized into 2 subtypes:

- type A reactions - predictable from known pharmacologic properties

- type B reactions - unpredictable and restricted to a vulnerable subpopulation - hypersensitivity reactions

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are different from the known pharmacologic toxicity profiles. Such reactions may result from a defined genetic defect, e.g. primaquine-induced hemolytic anemia, which depends on deficiency of the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD).

The mechanism of most idiosyncratic drug reactions remains obscure and often reflects a complex interaction of metabolic and constitutional factors (e.g., radiocontrast media reactions).

Drug reactions resulting from a drug-specific immune response constitute immunologic drug reactions, often referred to as drug allergy.

Drug hypersensitivity (allergy) is an immune-mediated reaction to a drug.

The distinction between idiosyncratic drug reactions and drug allergy can be difficult to make clinically.

The effector mechanisms in drug allergy are different from idiosyncratic reactions that mimic drug allergy (‘non-allergic or pseudoallergic drug hypersensitivity’).

Epidemiology

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) affect 10–20% of hospitalized patients and 25% of outpatients.

Rule of 10s in ADR

10% of patients develop ADR
10% are due to allergy
10% lead to anaphylaxis
10% lead to death

It is estimated that allergic reactions occur in about 5% of all treatments. Fatal drug reactions occur in 0.01-0.1% of inpatients mainly due to antibiotics and NSAIDs. Adverse reactions to drugs are twice as common in women. Antibiotics are the commonest cause of allergic reactions.

ADR are more common in women, this predilection to female gender is similar to urticaria and angioedema. Women have a 35% higher incidence of skin ADRs than men.

The majority of ADRs are type A reactions. Type B reactions are much less common, with an estimated frequency of 10–15% of all ADRs. Immune-mediated drug reactions constitute 6–10% of all ADRs.

The most common drug groups causing hypersensitivity reactions are:

- β-lactam antibiotics
- non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- radiocontrast media
- neuromuscular blocking agents
- antiepileptic drugs

Immediate hypersensitivity to local anesthetics is exceptionally rare, despite common complaints.

Skin reactions, such as maculopapular eruptions and urticaria are the most common clinical presentations for ADRs.

Rarely, drugs induce more severe and potentially life-threatening reactions such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens–Johnson syndrome, and immune hepatitis. Serum granulysin (level greater than 10 ng/mL) predicts Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis and the test takes just 5 minutes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:65-68.

In the USA, about 1 in 300 hospitalized patients dies from ADRs, amounting to 106,000 estimated deaths in 1994, of which 6–10% may be allergic in origin.

References

Drug Allergy. Middleton's Allergy: Principles and Practice, Mosby; 7 edition (November 19, 2008).
Clinical review: ABC of allergies. Adverse reactions to drugs. BMJ 1998;316:1511-1514.
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Drugs. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Faith L. Chia; Khai Pang Leong. Published on Medscape, 08/2007.

Multiple choice questions

Chapter 57: Drug Allergy. Allergy and Immunology Review Corner: Chapter 57 of Pediatric Allergy: Principles & Practices, edited by Donald Y.M. Leung, et al.

Published: 07/11/2007
Updated: 09/01/2011

Labels:

Eczema (Atopic Dermatitis)

Editor: V. Dimov, M.D., Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor at University of Chicago

Information For Patients

Bleach Baths Improve Atopic Dermatitis - How To Use Them?
Allergic Skin Conditions
Allergy Testing
Skin Allergy Quiz by AAAAI



Atopic Dermatitis Treatment - Illustrated (click to enlarge the image).



Allergic (atopic) march (click here to enlarge the image).

Information For Doctors

Atopic Dermatitis: Teaching Cases

Treatment of Exacerbation of Moderately Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic Dermatitis: Related Reading

Atopic Dermatitis: Brief Review
Mind maps of atopic dermatitis
Adult eczema: "It’s like always having poison ivy, but with no clue how you’re coming into contact with the plant". NYTimes, 2011.
Blog articles from AllergyNotes

Other Forms of Dermatitis

How to Diagnose Contact Dermatitis?
Common Rashes Not to Miss: Slideshow. Medscape.

Image source: Wikipedia, public domain.

Published: 07/12/2008
Updated: 12/15/2011

Labels: ,

<body>